Leadership

What Business Are You Really In?

The marketplace has changed. Has your definition of your business changed with it? Inherited assumptions can blind leaders to the people, capabilities, and human needs that now determine their relevance.

A few years ago, I sat in the audience at one of the largestbeer industry conferences in the country. A Wall Street analyst walked to thepodium, looked out at a room full of brewers, distributors and marketingexecutives, and said something that stopped me cold. "Ladies andgentlemen," he told them, "you are no longer in the beer industry.You are in the mood management industry."

The room went quiet. I watched people shift in their seatsthe way you do when someone says something true that you weren't ready to hear.Then he asked one question that hung over the entire conference: "Can youlead in the mood management industry?"

 I've thought about that moment for years, because itcaptures something I see almost everywhere I go — leaders running businessesthat no longer exist. Not because they're incompetent. Not because they aren'tworking hard. But because they never stopped to ask the one question thatdetermines whether their hard work actually matters: what business am I reallyin?

The Question Most Leaders Stopped Asking

Most leaders inherited their answer. They walked into anindustry, learned its language, adopted its assumptions, and built a career onthe premise that the business they joined is the business they'll retire from.I understand the comfort of that. I built my own early career on assumptions Iinherited rather than examined.

But the marketplace doesn't care what you inherited. It onlycares what's true right now.

The analyst wasn't being clever for the sake of it. He waspointing at a shift that had already happened. Consumers weren't choosing abeverage category anymore; they were choosing a feeling. Beer was now competingagainst seltzers, cannabis, wellness apps and a dozen other categories nobodyin that room had been trained to see as rivals. The business had changedunderneath the industry's feet, and most of the industry hadn't noticed.

A 22-Year-Old Saw It Before the Board Did

 I mentor a number of young professionals. One of them — 22years old, barely two years into her career — said something recently I haven'tbeen able to shake. We were talking about her work in fashion and journalism,and I asked her a simple question: what business is a magazine really in?

She didn't hesitate. "Tastemaking."

Then she kept going. Fashion? Tastemaking. Beer? That too,she argued — the party, the sponsors, the photos in your feed the next morningthat make you feel like you missed something. Any industry with a hand in thatimage is now competing with every other tastemaker on earth.

Twenty-two years old, and she named the real business fasterthan most boards I've sat across from. Not because she's smarter than thoseexecutives, though she might be. Because she isn't carrying decades ofinherited assumptions about what the business "is." She looked at theevidence in front of her instead of the org chart behind her.

That's the danger of proximity to legacy thinking. Itdoesn't just fail to help you see the shift. It actively blinds you to it.

Why You're Hiring for a Business That No Longer Exists

Here's where this becomes an urgent leadership problem, notjust an interesting observation.

Your résumé now goes through an AI filter before a humanever reads it. Judged against what? Against a specification written for theindustry you used to be in. So the person who gets rejected isn't the one whowasn't good enough. It's the one who didn't match a description that no longerfits the job. And the person who gets hired is the one who matched a companythat's already disappearing.

That's how an organization fills itself with the wrongpeople while following every process correctly.

When beer becomes mood management, it needs differentpeople. When journalism becomes tastemaking, it needs different people. Notdifferent skills. Different people. I've watched companies hire for"operational excellence" when their real business had shifted totrust-building, and hire for "technical expertise" when the real workhad become translation — turning complexity into something a customer canactually use.

Identity Is the Starting Point, Not the Byproduct

You cannot answer "what business am I really in"without first answering "who am I really being" while I run it. Thetwo questions are inseparable. Leaders performing a version of themselves thatno longer fits their organization will always misdiagnose the business they'rein, because they aren't seeing clearly. They're managing perception instead ofengaging reality.

I wrote about this at length in Earning Conviction, becauseI've come to believe the conviction crisis in leadership isn't really aboutstrategy. It's about clarity — the willingness to see your business, andyourself, without the comfortable distortions of inherited assumption.

If you're leading anything right now, keep one question withyou. Not at a strategy offsite. In your own head, every week: what business arewe really in? If the answer is the same one it was five years ago, you'reprobably not in that business anymore. Somebody just hasn't told you yet.

The Conviction Diagnostic
How much of you is edited?

Take the Conviction Diagnostic. In three minutes, see where you've traded who you are for who the room wanted, and exactly where to begin reclaiming it.

Start with the question most leaders can’t answer in a sentence: What do you solve for?
Begin the Conviction Diagnostic
© 2026 Glenn Llopis Group · Solving the Conviction Crisis
Identity Catalyst · ˈyō-pēs