The seventh president of Marymount University tells Glenn Llopis why the argument that college is not for everyone alarms her, and what she changed when students said remote learning was not working.
Dr. Irma Becerra
President, Marymount University
Marymount University
·
Personalization Outbreak podcast
·
31
min
·
Episode
84

no matter what happens, no one can ever take away your education. These were my grandmother's words and I live them every day.
Dr. Irma Becerra
Irma Becerra is the seventh president of Marymount University. She is an electrical engineer with three degrees in the field, and a Cuban immigrant who arrived in the United States as a baby. Glenn Llopis started with something she says alarms her: the spreading argument that college is simply not for everyone.
"College degrees have always been the most important determinant in social mobility... a college degree is a necessity. It is not a luxury." — Dr. Irma Becerra · 00:02:01
Her answer to the argument is a question. If college is not for everybody, then who is it for? Someone gets left outside the American dream, and she is unwilling to name the group. She points to the pandemic as a plain test of the degree’s value: the people who could keep working from home were largely the ones who had one.
"as we see the entrance of artificial intelligence, data science jobs are getting more and more complex, and many of the least complex jobs are being replaced by ai." — Dr. Irma Becerra · 00:02:01
Glenn asked what a more personalized education actually means in practice. Becerra started with what students learn that is not in any curriculum: how to think critically, how to hold a conversation with someone whose view is different, how to recognize that an image on social media may have been generated rather than photographed.
"We are very focused on a personalized education here at Marymount... because we know that not everybody, every student learns the same way." — Dr. Irma Becerra · 00:06:07
She learned it the hard way. The university moved to remote teaching within days in 2020, which was the right call for safety. But when she surveyed students that May, undergraduates and graduate students alike told her they were not learning as well: they missed the classroom, they missed learning from each other as much as from the professor, and they were distracted at home. So the university came back to campus in a socially distanced hybrid that autumn, and kept asking students what was working. Her point is less about classrooms than about the habit: she asked, and then she acted on the answer.
The structural part of the conversation is the part most leaders will recognize from their own organizations. Universities are built as departments inside schools inside a university, and the walls between them are solid.
"I call universities in general are collections of schools, because they are, there's so well-defined walls around the schools." — Dr. Irma Becerra · 00:16:47
During the pandemic she and her provost looked hard at that architecture and asked whether a university of their size needed it. They merged a long list of small departments and the separate schools into a smaller set of colleges and interdisciplinary schools. The result cut structural cost, but the reason was what employers had been telling them: they wanted engineers who could communicate and clinicians who understood some business. Becerra points out that she trained as an engineer and never took a course in communication.
"these are the dangers of standardization. We promote siloed thinking." — Glenn Llopis · 00:20:50
The second change gives the flexibility to the learner rather than the institution. At graduate level, students can stack certificates into a degree of their own design, choosing modules in areas like data science, cloud computing or entrepreneurship and assembling a master’s in emerging technologies, with similar programs in health and criminal justice. Flexibility in how you learn, and then flexibility in what you learn.
It reframes who higher education is for. Not eighteen to twenty-two, but a continuum: the accountant who wants to move into human resources, the nurse who wants to run a hospital, the analyst whose field did not exist when they took one statistics course. Becerra includes herself in that.
"I was not involved in any kind of public speaking. So I've had to upskill myself to be able to be on this podcast with you today, Glen." — Dr. Irma Becerra · 00:14:05
Her last move is outward. She describes the university of the future as one that works closely with the employers it serves rather than sitting in an ivory tower, and gives examples of partnerships that bring technical training and clinical mentorship to her students at no cost to them while giving those employers a pipeline of people ready to be productive. Glenn called it co-creation, and said what makes it work is that both sides learn.
She finished with her own story. She came to this country because of the Cuban Revolution, and she has given her career to education for one reason, which is the line at the top of this page. Education, she says, transformed the opportunities not only for her but for her family, and what she wants students to hear is that university leaders are waiting for them and intend to see them cross the stage.
Becerra told Glenn Llopis that degrees have always been the strongest determinant of social mobility, and that the pandemic made it visible: the people able to keep working from home were largely the ones who held one. She argues the claim that college is not for everyone leaves whole groups outside the American dream.
Becerra told Glenn Llopis that she surveyed students in May 2020, heard that they were not learning as well away from the classroom, and brought the university back to a socially distanced hybrid that autumn while continuing to ask students what worked for them.
That the walls between academic schools are so well defined that the institution behaves like a set of separate organizations. Becerra told Glenn Llopis that her university merged small departments and separate schools into fewer colleges and interdisciplinary schools, because employers wanted graduates whose skills crossed those walls.
Glenn Llopis is The Identity Catalyst. For more than twenty years he has helped leaders and organizations reclaim the identity they edited away and lead from earned conviction. He is a Forbes contributor, the author of six books, and the founder of Glenn Llopis Group.
Read Glenn's story →© 2026 Glenn Llopis. All rights reserved.
This page is the original work of Glenn Llopis and is protected by copyright. Quotations are drawn from a recorded conversation and are attributed to the speaker. The page may not be republished, reproduced, distributed or adapted, in whole or in part, in print, online or by AI tools, without prior written consent. You are welcome to share the link or quote a brief excerpt with credit to Glenn Llopis and a link back to this page. Guests featured here are welcome to share and excerpt their own interview. For permission requests, contact solutions@glennllopisgroup.com.
Take the Conviction Diagnostic. In three minutes, see where you've traded who you are for who the room wanted, and exactly where to begin reclaiming it.
His story starts where reinvention did: a family that left everything behind for a new country and refused to call it loss. Cuban Roots →
