Individuality

·

Leadership

Thirty Decisions in Thirty Minutes

The purpose of a meeting is to make decisions. Leaders who run meetings well make dozens of them, about the agenda and about the people in the room, and they turn those decisions into momentum.

By Glenn Llopis

·

4

min read

Thirty Decisions in Thirty Minutes, an article by Glenn Llopis

A meeting that ends without a decision has spent everyone's time and bought nothing. That is the standard I hold leaders to: the goal of a meeting is to make decisions, and the best leaders can make 30 solid decisions in 30 minutes.

That sounds like a lot, a decision every minute. But most of those decisions are not about agenda items. They are about the people in the room: who came prepared, who is holding back, how confident the group is, whether the team can deliver what it is committing to, and who needs support after the call ends. A leader who only tracks the agenda makes a handful of calls. A leader who reads the room makes thirty.

Meanwhile, calendars are stacked with video calls and recurring check-ins that no one remembers scheduling. People multitask their way through them, cameras off, half listening. Meetings have become a commodity, and like any commodity, their value has dropped. That is a leadership problem, not a scheduling problem. The person who calls the meeting owns what happens in it.

Meetings Should Be the Exception

Organizations now ask everyone to manage their responsibilities as if they were running their own business. With shared workspaces and project tools, very few updates require people to stop what they are doing and gather. When the information already exists, a meeting to repeat it is a tax on everyone's focus.

So before you send the invite, ask whether the meeting will produce a call to action that moves the business. If it will not, don't have it. Use the time you save to stay close enough to the work that you never need an update meeting to know what is happening.

When a meeting does earn its place on the calendar, five disciplines keep it there.

1. Have a Tangible Reason

A meeting should exist to solve an important problem or enable an opportunity. Both should connect to the plan your team is executing, and both should affect cost, revenue or the experience of the people you serve. If you can't name the outcome in one sentence, you are not ready to call the meeting.

2. Define the Agenda and Stay on Point

Send the agenda early enough that people can prepare to make decisions, not just react. Build it around the insights you need from specific people. When participants arrive with their own agendas, acknowledge the ones that support the goal, and redirect the ones that distract.

3. Make Expectations Clear for Every Participant

Each person you invite should know why they are there and what you expect them to contribute. Give each one a role. Invite those who directly advance the agenda and those whose perspective will sharpen the outcome. Then value their time. Ask whether someone on their team could attend in their place and grow from the experience.

4. Close With Candid Feedback

Reserve the last five minutes to go around the room, or the screen, and ask for closing thoughts. This is when people are most candid about whether the time was well spent. It is also the moment for the quiet voices who did not speak earlier, and for you to make the final calls on next steps before everyone leaves.

5. List Your Decisions and Build the Plan

After the meeting, write down the decisions you made, prioritize them and note who helped you make each one and why. Then finalize your action plan. It is how you learn how you think during a meeting, how your judgment evolves and how to better use each participant next time.

The Decisions No One Writes Down

I once sat in a leadership summit where an executive opened by announcing a new priority that would shape how the company built teams, managed client relationships and pursued new business. The room went silent. Then one leader out of about 300 raised his hand and asked, "What does this mean to me as a leader? How does this change what others expect from me as a leader?" Did anybody answer that question? No one did.

That silence was a decision too. Meeting notes record what was said. They can't tell you who was disengaged, which commitment sounded hollow or whose question deserved an answer. Those people decisions determine whether a team builds momentum or just generates minutes.

Before You Send the Next Invite

  • Audit your calendar. Cancel one recurring meeting that exists only to share updates.
  • Write the outcome first. Put the decision you need at the top of every agenda.
  • Assign roles. Tell each invitee what you expect them to bring.
  • Count your decisions. After your next meeting, list every decision you made, including the ones about people.

If you are attending rather than leading, try the same exercise from your seat. List the decisions you believe the leader should be making, and compare notes afterward. It is one of the best ways to show up well in the meetings where every moment is an audition.

Make your meetings matter. Get to the point, respect people's time and lead with clarity before authority. Once you master this discipline, 30 decisions will quickly become 50.

Want to explore these ideas further? Learn more about my work on leadership, identity and conviction at www.theglennllopis.com.

Glenn Llopis

Founder and CEO of Glenn Llopis Group, author of seven books and creator of Leadership in the Age of Personalization.

Take the Conviction Diagnostic
The Conviction Diagnostic
How much of you is edited?

Take the Conviction Diagnostic. In three minutes, see where you've traded who you are for who the room wanted, and exactly where to begin reclaiming it.

Start with the question most leaders can’t answer in a sentence: What do you solve for?
Begin the Conviction Diagnostic
© 2026 Glenn Llopis Group · Solving the Conviction Crisis
Identity Catalyst · ˈyō-pēs